Policy Analysis Paper/CJA/464 Essay

insurance is a large part of policing in the United States. Policy suspensors mess justness, and law helps keep order amid the chaos if obligate properly. But every policy moldiness be looked at c arfully before, during and later on enforcement to make sure that policy is and continues to be the dress hat fit for the issues at hand. sometimes looking at two policies and comparability them can help induce a solution in the middle. It is important to depart a policy a real goal, to accomplish in a realistic time in order to run into tabu if it was truly effective or non. law-breaking turn back Model/ imputable Process Model Crime ascendency model places emphasis on victimisation more police and harder court sentences to help deter and hopefully reduce crime. It utilizes the powers held by the goernment to nurse the multitude, with limited regards to their rights (Sociology Index, 2013). It chooses tougher penalty to crimes and on the illegals that perform them. Cr ime Control model argues that sometimes, persons should cut into up their rights, to protect and benefit monastic order as a whole. Often mickle argon delusive to be guilty until proven loose. collect Process tries to focus on the rights of the individuals and adjustment the power held by the government. People that propensity to limit government tend to favor the collect process model over the crime control model. In the collectable process model, good deal are innocent until proven guilty, and are not adequately punished until their guilt is well launch through the criminal justice system. for each one model has their place in our criminal justice system, having twain strengths and weaknesses. As society changes, the models must be willing to swap off to adapt to the crime conditions for that time. some(prenominal) embrace some aspects of the core tag of the constitution, and while the focusings they can cast to bum aroundher are few, they do bring on their mom ents. Policies/ Opinion The Border Search of nurture Policy is a policy set forth in 2008 which allows Border guard agents the ability to search and seize both printed and electronic materials and devices without postulateing a warrant or likely cause (CPB, 2008). If an individual is sack through a check quest or both Border patrol station, the officers may choose to pull them deflexion for a random watch.During the course of that inspection they may go through either and all electronic and printed items (ACLU, 2013). ICE and part of Homeland Security prepare convertible policies. These policies all seem to throw out the fourth amendment which states The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.(Fourth Amendment, 1789) Some argue that this is a necessary right to forgo, to stop such things as child pornography, or associate to terrorism (DHS, 2014). I have point heard the excuse of If you have zipper to hide, it shouldnt be a problem. I respectfully have to disagree, quoting Benjamin Franklin They who would give up substantial Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety. (Franklin).Currently this policy seems to favor crime control, and not due process, violating peoples rights without just cause. Roles of the Courts The courts play a few aims in this policy. One role is as they are prosecuting the violations several cases index get thrown out due to the constitutionality of the search. Courts have the power to look at this policy, and try to find a way to fix the constitutional rights that are beingness violated within before people that deserve to get punished, get set free to continue their illegal activities.If th is does not change, many more innocent people maybe hurt as their rights are violated trying to attempt to gimp people that will try to get away with a crime any way they can. Some may view they have zilch to hide, that theyve done nothing wrong, only to be caught because in a text message they talk close to something private that may raise questions in the eyes of the officer. Conclusion . The people need to know that they are going to be innocent until proven guilty and they have to trust that the government always has their best interest in mind.This includes keeping their essential constitutional rights in mind, and protecting them from manageable abuse of power by officers who intuitive feeling above the law. Due process and Crime control models do have their place, and the inelegants courts must attempt to find a balance between the rights of the individuals and the certificate of society. By analyzing the policies at hand, and establishing clear boundaries ensures tha t the criminals are caught the correct way, and the rights of the innocent people are left undamaged.